out this morning.
Lamont postures as a businessman who was so outraged by the war in Iraq, and by Lieberman's support of it, that he couldn't keep himself from running. Really? Lamont gave money to Lieberman as late as February 2005, when the senator's war position was clear.
But even if Lamont has grown into a committed anti-war activist, he has no clue what to do. He's a complainer, not a leader.
http://www.nydailynews.com/...
In this case, if they choose Lamont over Lieberman, Democrats in Connecticut will be losing a leader. And they'll be gaining a man who is at best a cipher and at worst a shameless panderer on matters of central importance to American security.
Read on ...
http://www.nydailynews.com/...